Public health and economic impact of vaccination with 7-valent pneumococcal vaccine (PCV7) in the context of the annual influenza epidemic and a severe influenza pandemic
© Rubin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 9 October 2009
Accepted: 21 January 2010
Published: 21 January 2010
Influenza pandemic outbreaks occurred in the US in 1918, 1957, and 1968. Historical evidence suggests that the majority of influenza-related deaths during the 1918 US pandemic were attributable to bacterial pneumococcal infections. The 2009 novel influenza A (H1N1) outbreak highlights the importance of interventions that may mitigate the impact of a pandemic.
A decision-analytic model was constructed to evaluate the impact of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) on pneumococcal disease incidence and mortality during a typical influenza season (13/100) and a severe influenza pandemic (30/100). Outcomes were compared for current PCV7 vaccination practices vs. no vaccination. The model was estimated using published sources and includes indirect (herd) protection of non-vaccinated persons.
The model predicts that PCV7 vaccination in the US is cost saving for a normal influenza season, reducing pneumococcal-related costs by $1.6 billion. In a severe influenza pandemic, vaccination would save $7.3 billion in costs and prevent 512,000 cases of IPD, 719,000 cases of pneumonia, 62,000 IPD deaths, and 47,000 pneumonia deaths; 84% of deaths are prevented due to indirect (herd) protection in the unvaccinated.
PCV7 vaccination is highly effective and cost saving in both normal and severe pandemic influenza seasons. Current infant vaccination practices may prevent >1 million pneumococcal-related deaths in a severe influenza pandemic, primarily due to herd protection.
Pandemic influenza outbreaks occurred in the US in 1918, 1957, and 1968, and the World Health Organization declared the novel influenza A (H1N1) virus a pandemic in June 2009. The most notable pandemic occurred in 1918 (H1N1 strain) and caused at least 20 million deaths worldwide, with some estimates as high as 100 million [1–4]. Infection rates (25 - 50% of the population) and deaths (up to 2%) were much higher than is typically observed in an influenza outbreak . A severe influenza pandemic similar to 1918 would have devastating effects in the US and globally, with an estimated 90 million cases of influenza, 1.9 million deaths, 9.9 million hospitalizations, 42 million outpatient visits, and costs of up to $255 billion in the US alone .
The unprecedented severity of the 1918 influenza pandemic has led to much research, particularly on the high burden of mortality in otherwise healthy young adults. Experts agree that influenza alone cannot explain the extraordinary number of pandemic deaths, but attach different emphasis to the role of secondary bacterial pneumonias. More recent studies support the conclusions of investigators at the time of the pandemic  that most deaths were due to complications of bacterial pneumonia. A study of autopsy samples from victims of the 1918 pandemic found bacteria in all samples, pointing to bacterial pneumonia as the cause of death . Further, an analysis of the time to death from pneumonia associated with influenza in 1918 shows concordance with contemporary accounts of time to death from pneumococcal pneumonia . A recent autopsy study of H1N1 victims found bacterial pneumonia in 55% of their samples . These observations are further supported by a recent double-blind randomized trial of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children not vaccinated for influenza that demonstrated a 45% lower incidence of hospitalization due to influenza-associated pneumonia among those receiving the pneumococcal vaccine .
In 2000, the 7-valent pneumococcal vaccine (PCV7; Prevenar; Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, acquired by Pfizer in October 2009) was approved for pediatric use and recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for children aged up to 59 months . Routine infant vaccination with PCV7 (administered at 2, 4, 6, and 12 to 15 months of age)  has markedly decreased the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in both the vaccinated and general populations [14–16]. CDC analyses from 2005 indicate that most IPD (69%) was prevented through indirect (herd) effects of the vaccine , likely due to decreased nasopharyngeal carriage of pneumococcal strains among immunized children, resulting in decreased transmission to non-immunized children and adults . The impact of PCV7 on pneumococcal disease - including pneumonia  and IPD  - in the unvaccinated population, and the likely synergies between pneumococcal disease and influenza, suggest current PCV7 vaccination practices may reduce morbidity and mortality in an influenza pandemic. While influenza vaccination remains the most effective means of reducing influenza-related morbidity and mortality, the risk of influenza and pneumococcal disease co-infection in a pandemic, along with the ability to vaccinate individuals prior to the onset of a pandemic, provide strong rationale for considering pneumococcal vaccination in the context of influenza. This study examines the public health and economic impact of current pneumococcal vaccination policies in the context of the annual influenza epidemic and a severe influenza pandemic.
We used a decision-analytic model of pneumococcal disease incidence and outcomes to assess the impact of current US pneumococcal vaccination practices on pneumococcal disease burden during both an annual influenza epidemic and a severe influenza pandemic, relative to the hypothetical burden if no pneumococcal immunization program had been implemented. The model considers outcomes of pneumococcal disease only; morbidity, mortality and costs of influenza without pneumococcal co-infection are not considered. Outcomes include cases of pneumococcal disease, pneumococcal-related deaths, costs, survival (in life-years [LYs]) and quality-adjusted survival (in quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). To simulate a single influenza season, epidemiologic outcomes were calculated over a 1-year period; incremental costs, survival, and quality-adjusted survival reflect lifetime consequences of events occurring during this 1-year period. Future costs and health outcomes were discounted to present values using a 3% annual discount rate . This analysis presents results from a payer perspective and all costs are in 2006 dollars.
Age group (years)
0 - <2
2 - 4
5 - 17
18 - 49
50 - 64
Annual Incidence per 100,000
All-cause otitis media (per person)/c
Case Fatality Rates
Proportion meningitis cases resulting in (%)
Indirect (herd) effect/h
Indirect (herd) effect/j
All-cause otitis media
Indirect (herd) effect/k
Costs ($) per Case of Pneumococcal Disease
Population, Vaccine Coverage, Incidence & Mortality
The age group distribution of the US population was estimated from the 2006 US Census . Current vaccination practices are defined based on 2006 data from the National Immunization Survey (NIS) as 87% of children <2 years vaccinated with PCV7; 79% of these children receive 4 doses, and the remainder 3 doses. We assumed that children aged 2 to 4 years were vaccinated an average of 2 years prior to the start of the model, therefore, NIS data from 2004 were used to estimate the proportion of children in this age group who retained vaccine protection (69% of those receiving 3 or more doses and 71% of those receiving 4 doses) . Age-specific disease incidence rates before PCV7, case-fatality rates, and complication probabilities for pneumococcal disease manifestations were estimated from published sources [14, 15, 21, 22, 26–31].
Vaccine Efficacy & Indirect (Herd) Effects
Vaccine effectiveness (efficacy and indirect [herd] effects) estimates in all age groups are shown in Table 1. Vaccine efficacy estimates against IPD in children <5 years were based on results of the NCKP trial. In vaccinated children <2 years, vaccination was assumed to directly reduce the probability of pneumococcal infection by the recorded efficacy of the vaccine  for children 2 - 4 years; efficacy was reduced to reflect waning effectiveness of the vaccine over time . Indirect (herd) effects were incorporated in the model as a percent reduction in disease incidence. To calculate herd effects on IPD in the vaccine-eligible population, we used differences in the observed changes in disease incidence from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Active Bacterial Core Surveillance (ABCs) Report and direct vaccine efficacy from the NCKP trial, assuming all changes in incidence not attributable to vaccine efficacy were attributable to indirect (herd) effects [14, 15, 23].
Ecologic data on pneumonia-related hospital admissions and AOM visits suggests that PCV7 vaccination may have led to larger reductions in all-cause pneumonia (39.0%) and AOM (42.7%) in children than trial efficacy data indicate [18, 23, 32]. We therefore estimated the effectiveness (both direct and indirect) of vaccination in children as the midpoint between the NCKP trial estimates and the ecologic data [32–34]. We then calculated the indirect (herd) effect of vaccination assuming all changes in incidence not attributable to direct protection were attributable to indirect (herd) protection and that indirect (herd) effects apply to both the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations.
Indirect (herd) effects in the unvaccinated age groups were calculated from observed reductions in IPD incidence [14, 15] before and after the introduction of PCV7 ; all reductions in disease were assumed to occur in the 7 serotypes included in the vaccine. Because it is not known what proportion of the observed reduction in pneumonia is attributable to the vaccine, and regional analyses have not supported changes observed in national datasets [26, 35], we assumed that effects in the unvaccinated were equal to 50% of the estimated effect reported by Grijalva et al. .
One-year cumulative influenza incidence was calculated from the CDC's Flu Activity & Surveillance Weekly Activity Reports (13%) [36, 37]. It was assumed that persons with influenza were at a higher risk of pneumococcal disease than those without influenza. Persons without influenza were considered the reference group and those with influenza were assumed to have 7.7% increased risk of pneumococcal disease; the increased risk was calculated from a study that examined excess pneumococcal infections during a normal influenza season (RR: 1.077) . Base-case probabilities of pneumococcal disease were adjusted to reflect the non-pandemic relative risk for persons with versus without influenza; therefore overall rates of disease in a non-pandemic year are equal to incidence rates from the literature. We assumed that persons treated for influenza were at 26.3% lower risk of pneumococcal disease relative to untreated persons based on the reduction in duration of influenza from a trial of oseltamivir versus placebo [39, 40]. The proportion treated for influenza was estimated from published sources examining treatment patterns for influenza [41–44].
Costs & Utilities
All costs were estimated from published sources and converted to 2006 US dollars using the Consumer Price Index [18, 21, 22, 45–49]. The average price for a single dose of PCV7 was assumed to be $66.50  with an administration cost of $9.92 . To account for the 5-year benefit of vaccination, we amortized the cost over a 5-year period, discounting all future years by 3%. Utility values, measures of quality-of-life ranging from 0 to 1 used to calculate QALYs, were adapted from a cost-effectiveness analysis of pneumococcal vaccination . Utilities associated with acute disease states were incorporated into the model by assigning a "toll" in the form of an absolute QALY decrement to each episode of illness. We applied a decrement of 0.023 for meningitis, 0.008 for bacteremic pneumonia, 0.006 for hospitalized pneumonia, 0.004 for non-hospitalized pneumonia, and 0.005 for AOM to all age groups. Utilities for chronic states (deafness and disability) were estimated from retrospective studies of meningococcal complications as 0.73 for deafness and 0.68 for disability [51, 52] and applied to the remaining life expectancy.
To test the assumption that synergies between influenza and pneumococcal disease observed during a normal influenza season are magnified during a pandemic [53–55], we increased the incidence of influenza in our model to 30%, which is consistent with expected incidence of influenza in a pandemic in the US . However, we were unable to replicate the increased incidence of pneumococcal disease seen during the 1918 pandemic. To estimate the effect of influenza on pneumococcal disease incidence during a severe pandemic, we calibrated the increased relative risk of pneumonia (bacteremic and non-bacteremic) for those with influenza versus those without to achieve the 5% incidence of combined infection with influenza and pneumonia observed in 1918 . To estimate age-specific influenza and pneumonia incidence, we applied estimates of age-specific excess population mortality in 13 countries, and scaled the pneumonia and influenza incidence in proportion to the observed excess pneumococcal and influenza-related mortality in the US (0.39%), assuming 30% of persons had influenza . When performing the calibration, we also assumed that 30% of pneumonia cases were bacteremic in a severe pandemic . The largest increase in incidence was observed among influenza cases in the 18 - 49 year age group (4-fold). Due to the introduction of antibiotics, it was deemed unlikely that the next pandemic would result in the excess mortality of 0.39% seen in the US during the 1918 pandemic. We assumed that case-fatality rates for IPD and pneumonia during a severe pandemic would instead be similar to those of persons on antibiotic therapy (10% for all-cause pneumonia in all age groups and 10% for IPD for those <50 years) . The case-fatality for those >50 years was assumed to be equal to the case-fatality rates in a normal influenza season.
Base-case analyses assumed a population of 300 million people. It was assumed that 7.2 million infants (<2 years of age) were fully vaccinated at the start of the model, and that 8.5 million children 2 - 4 years of age had been vaccinated prior to the start of the model and were still receiving immunological benefits. Unvaccinated persons benefited from vaccination via indirect (herd) effects. The model was used to calculate cases of pneumococcal disease avoided, deaths averted, QALYs gained, LYs saved, and costs. Cases avoided and deaths averted were calculated as the difference in the total number of cases/deaths under a policy of no vaccination minus the total number of cases/deaths under current vaccination practices. Total costs with vaccination were calculated as the cost of vaccination less any cost offsets associated with avoiding disease.
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated in terms of additional cost per QALY gained or additional cost per LY saved, and calculated by dividing the difference in costs by the difference in QALYs or LYs. LYs saved for each death averted were calculated using the discounted life expectancy at each age. QALYs gained were calculated based on LYs saved, first converting discounted life expectancy at each age into quality-adjusted life expectancy, then weighting each discounted year of life by an age-specific utility weight for healthy individuals . Lifetime consequences of meningitis were included by assigning the utility associated with meningitis sequelae for the duration of age-specific discounted life-expectancy and subtracting the resulting quality-adjusted life-expectancy from the quality-adjusted life-expectancy without meningitis sequelae. Finally, to account for acute illness disutility, QALY decrements were subtracted from quality-adjusted life-expectancy. All costs and life years were discounted at 3% per annum. Analyses were conducted under conditions of a normal influenza season (influenza incidence of 13%) and a severe pandemic season (influenza incidence of 30%).
Because the pneumonia and influenza incidence distribution of a future pandemic is uncertain, we re-calibrated the pandemic parameters to reflect the current age distribution of pneumococcal disease. The overall calibration target remained at 5% incidence of combined pneumonia and influenza; however, we re-distributed the burden such that persons >65 years and <2 years had the highest incidence of pneumococcal disease and those aged 5 - 49 years the lowest. Case-fatality rates remained unchanged from the base-case pandemic analysis.
A series of one-way sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of model results to plausible alternative assumptions regarding input parameters. The proportion of the observed reduction in pneumonia post-introduction of PCV7 that is attributable to PCV7 is uncertain; we varied the indirect (herd) effect on pneumonia from zero to the values reported by Grijalva et al. . Because treatment patterns for influenza may change during a pandemic, we varied the percent of persons treated for influenza by ± 25%. To reflect the uncertainty in the incidence and mortality burden of a future pandemic, we re-estimated the model assuming that bacteremic pneumonia incidence and case-fatality were reduced by 50% from the base-case. To account for the effect of possible antibiotic shortages during a pandemic, case-fatality rates for bacteremic and all-cause pneumonia were increased to 20 percent. Other sensitivity analyses included:  reducing assumed effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination on AOM to 6% (reported in the NCKP trial ) and increasing effectiveness to the 42.7% reported by Zhou et al. ;  varying price of the vaccine by ± 10%;  varying incidence of invasive disease by ± 10%; and  varying vaccine coverage rates by ± 10 percent. Sensitivity analyses are reported for pandemic conditions only.
Non-pandemic influenza season
The model predicts that current vaccination practices prevent approximately 32,300 IPD cases, 550,100 pneumonia cases, 2,200 IPD deaths, and 21,000 pneumonia deaths during a normal influenza season. Cost savings are estimated to be $1.57 billion; vaccination with PCV7 is predicted to be less costly as well as more effective than no PCV7 vaccination (i.e., dominant).
Severe pandemic season
Incidence in pandemic and non-pandemic years
Age group (years)
Annual Incidence of PD per 100,000
0 - <2
2 - 4
5 - 17
18 - 49
50 - 64
Incidence of PD in a non-pandemic year (13% influenza incidence)
Among persons without influenza
Among persons with influenza
Incidence of PD in a severe pandemic year (30% influenza incidence)
Among persons with influenza/a
Base-case and sensitivity analysis results
Cost (savings) in billions of $
Re-calibrated using current non-pandemic incidence distribution by age
Incidence and case-fatality of bacteremic pneumonia - reduced by 50%
Case-fatality rates for IPD and pneumonia - increased to 20%
Herd effect on pneumonia
15% - 26%
Incidence of IPD (per 100,000)
296 - 8,365
383 - 10,224
Incidence of all-cause pneumonia (per 100,000)
5 - 165
7 - 202
Vaccine effectiveness on AOM (<2 Yr)
Vaccine coverage (<2)
Price of vaccine
8% - 16%
14% - 26%
Case-fatality from IPD
0.8% - 25%
0.9% - 30%
Case-fatality from all-cause pneumonia
0.4% - 4.7%
0.5% - 6%
In addition to the base-case estimates, table 3 shows the sensitivity of pneumococcal disease cases, deaths, and costs to variations in model inputs in a severe pandemic influenza season. Redistributing the disease burden to reflect current age distributions of disease incidence results in fewer cases of IPD avoided due to less indirect (herd) effect against bacteremic pneumonia in the elderly when compared with younger adults (18 - 49 years).
Model results are sensitive to reductions in the incidence and case-fatality rates of bacteremic pneumonia and all-cause pneumonia, which lead to substantial cases and deaths averted as well as cost savings. Assuming additional herd protection against pneumonia at the levels reported by Grijalva et al.  or additional vaccine effectiveness against AOM , substantially increases cost savings. Assumed changes in vaccination practices as well as small changes (± 10%) in the percentage of persons receiving treatment for influenza, the case-fatality from IPD or pneumonia, and the price of the vaccine have minimal effects on model results.
To our knowledge, no other studies have evaluated the economic impact of vaccination with PCV7 during an influenza pandemic. Studies have examined the cost-effectiveness of PCV7 against pneumococcal disease [21, 22, 50, 60–63]. However, these studies did not examine PCV7 in the context of influenza. Results of our study are consistent with studies examining other interventions to reduce the epidemiologic and economic impact of an influenza pandemic. For example, studies in Israel , Singapore  and the UK  found stock-piling antiviral drugs to be either cost-effective or cost saving in a pandemic. One study assessed vaccination with a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in the context of an influenza pandemic in the Netherlands. The study found that in the absence of an available influenza vaccine at the start of a pandemic, pneumococcal vaccination should be administered to the elderly and groups at a high risk for influenza, in order to limit the number of resulting hospitalizations and deaths .
Several conservative assumptions regarding the effects of pneumococcal vaccination and disease epidemiology were made. We assumed no direct protection against pneumococcal disease after 5 years of age. While it is unlikely that the vaccine will wane to zero when children turn age 5, data are not available to characterize the degree of waning vaccine efficacy in this age group over time. We therefore made assumptions consistent with previously published cost-effectiveness models of PCV7 . The pneumonia (bacteremic and non-bacteremic) case-fatality rate of 10% during a pandemic assumes access to antibiotics would not be disrupted; however, it is likely that access may be restricted due to increased demand and subsequent shortages. We also included conservative estimates of indirect (herd) effects against AOM and pneumonia in the vaccine-eligible population, taking the midpoint of observed vaccine efficacy in the NCKP trial and the observed reductions in hospital admissions from a community-based study [18, 26, 32]. Even under these conservative assumptions, the base-case outputs predict a large positive public health and economic impact of vaccination.
Our study is subject to a number of limitations inherent in the study design. First, the decision-analytic model is necessarily a highly simplified representation of the disease transmission and outcomes of pneumococcal disease. Although we accounted for some differences in treatment and outcomes using age stratification, we recognize that the US population and health-care delivery system is highly heterogeneous and may not be well represented by the relatively simple structure of this model. We also note that data used to estimate vaccine effectiveness and outcomes were derived and synthesized from a variety of sources, and this process of interpretation and decision-making is subject to bias. Although extensive sensitivity analyses to evaluate the effect of alternative parameter choices on our outcomes showed no change in the overall conclusions, we recognize that different assumptions may have yielded different results. Costs used in this analysis were taken from published data and standard sources; the extent to which they reflect the true costs of administering medical care is unknown. Furthermore, this study was conducted from a third-party payer perspective rather than a societal perspective, and as such does not include costs of pneumococcal disease related to lost productivity, caregiver time, transportation, or other unreimbursed expenses. Inclusion of indirect costs presumably would have added substantially to the total cost burden of pneumococcal disease and the potential cost savings with PCV7. In addition, the model was estimated using US data, and care should be used in generalizing our results to other settings and populations.
Because the disease and mortality burden have differed both in magnitude and age distribution during the four pandemics that have occurred in the past century, it is difficult to characterize a "typical" pandemic. Our assumptions derived from the 1918 pandemic likely reflect a relatively severe influenza pandemic scenario. Preliminary novel influenza A (H1N1) pandemic data indicate that it is less virulent than previous pandemic strains, with fewer required hospitalizations, and deaths more likely to be concentrated in those with underlying medical conditions . There is also evidence that the presence of secondary bacterial infections in persons with influenza is lower in the 2009 pandemic relative to the 1918 pandemic [10, 69], indicating that the novel H1N1 disease burden will likely fall between that of a normal season and a severe pandemic. Because PCV7 vaccination is beneficial under both the severe pandemic and seasonal epidemic scenario, we can infer that PCV7 would also result in cost savings and public health benefits in a less severe pandemic. Future analyses assessing the impact of pneumococcal vaccination in the context of the novel influenza A (H1N1) pandemic will be undertaken as more data become available.
We acknowledge that access to care and antibiotics, as well as volume and means of travel have changed dramatically since 1918. However, under various assumptions meant to capture how access to care, antibiotic use, and differences in disease transmission may alter disease dynamics (i.e., reducing incidence and mortality during a pandemic), pneumococcal vaccination still remains highly cost saving. We also acknowledge that this 1-year model estimated from 2006 data includes the indirect (herd) effects of a national immunization program with PCV7 that has been established over 6 years, and only accounts for the costs of vaccination of 4 birth cohorts (children aged 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 4 years). In order to quantify the current value of the ongoing vaccination program, we chose to include the full effects of vaccination. If we had accounted for the costs and benefits over each year since the launch of PCV7, the economic argument likely would be diminished, as the indirect benefit grew over the 4 - 6 years after the launch of the vaccine. However, even if we assume that only half of the indirect benefit had accrued after 4 years of vaccination, the model predicts that vaccination would avoid >700,000 cases of pneumonia and save >$3.5 billion in a severe influenza pandemic year.
We also note that the model includes neither the cost nor potential benefits of influenza vaccination at the onset of a pandemic. Assumed pandemic-level rates of influenza in the model are consistent with no vaccination or a vaccine miss-match. If, however, we assume the influenza vaccine is well matched (80% efficacy) with coverage equal to that reported in 2006 , severe pandemic incidence would decline from 30% to 24 percent . Under these conditions, the model predicts that vaccination with PCV7 would result in 681,000 cases of pneumonia avoided (compared to 715,000 cases in the base-case) and $6.2 billion in cost savings. Non-pandemic model results are based on recent influenza incidence data and reflect current rates of influenza vaccination.
Finally, it is important to note that S. pneumoniae is not the only pathogen known to complicate influenza during a pandemic. In a recent autopsy study of 22 H1N1 victims with bacterial co-infection, 45% were co-infected with S. pneumoniae, 32% were co-infected with S. aureus, and 27% were co-infected with Group A streptococcus (GAS). It is possible that S. aureus or GAS could be the primary cause of bacterial co-infections in a future influenza pandemic, and S. pneumonaie could play a less prominent role than in past pandemics. In that case, the benefits of pneumococcal vaccination would be less than those reported in this analysis. Vaccination programs against other pathogens such as S. aureus or GAS should be considered as other possibilities for influenza pandemic preparedness.
Our model predicts that routine pneumococcal vaccination is a proactive approach to mitigate effects of a future influenza pandemic, preventing numerous cases of pneumococcal disease and averting >100,000 deaths. The model also highlights the potential to save billions of dollars in health-care costs during an influenza pandemic by avoiding cases of pneumococcal disease and associated health-care utilization. This analysis details additional potential public health and economic benefits of universal vaccination with PCV7, which has already been estimated to be highly cost-effective or cost saving in many countries from various regions of the world [50, 62–64]. Countries that have not yet implemented a pneumococcal vaccination program may want to consider it as part of influenza pandemic preparedness.
The biological plausibility of a link between influenza and increased risk for subsequent pneumococcal disease rests on a number of biological responses to influenza that increase susceptibility to pneumococcal infection . The timing of the exposure to the pneumococcus in relation to the influenza appears to be critical to the outcome in mice-- there is no increased mortality if the pneumococcal exposure precedes influenza, an intermediate risk if exposure is concurrent, and greatly increased risk for a pneumococcal exposure 7 days post-influenza . The likely biological basis for this observation is the effect of γ-interferon, which peaks in mice at 7 days post-influenza and inhibits the ability of alveolar macrophages to clear the pneumococcus . Studies in humans suggest that deaths during the 1918 influenza pandemic were due to complications of bacterial pneumonia [7, 8]. Moreover, recent research suggests that pneumococcal conjugate vaccine reduces influenza-associated pneumonia hospitalizations .
Given the apparent link between pneumococcal disease and influenza, it is likely that vaccination with PCV7 would reduce the public health burden during an influenza pandemic. Our model predicts that current pneumococcal vaccination practices would substantially reduce the number of cases of all-cause pneumonia and deaths during a severe influenza pandemic by approximately 719,000 and 47,000, respectively. The model also predicts considerable cost savings associated with avoiding pneumococcal disease episodes ($7.3 billion). A large number of the cases avoided are attributable to indirect (herd) effects in the unvaccinated; however, even when indirect (herd) effects are reduced or eliminated, the model still predicts a significant reduction in pneumococcal-related costs during a pandemic.
Funding for this research was provided by Wyeth Research, which was acquired by Pfizer in October 2009.
- Kamps BS, Hoffmann C, Preiser W: Influenza report 2006. 2008, Accessed December 24, [http://www.influenzareport.com]Google Scholar
- Trust for America's Health: Pandemic flu and the potential for U.S. economic recession: a state-by-state analysis, March 2007. 2008, Accessed December 24, [http://healthyamericans.org/reports/flurecession/]Google Scholar
- Taubenberger JK, Morens DM: 1918 Influenza: the mother of all pandemics. 2008, Accessed December 24, [http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol12no01/05-0979.htm]Google Scholar
- Johnson NP, Mueller J: Updating the accounts: global mortality of the 1918-1920 "Spanish" influenza pandemic. Bull Hist Med. 2002, 76 (1): 105-15. 10.1353/bhm.2002.0022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Markel H: Why pandemic influenza is so frightening: a look back at 1918 in the hope of inspiring informed concern for the present and future. Medscape Public Health & Prevention. 2006, 4 (2):Google Scholar
- Meltzer MI, Cox NJ, Fukuda K: The economic impact of pandemic influenza in the United States: priorities for intervention. Emer Infect Dis. 1999, 5 (5): 659-71. 10.3201/eid0505.990507.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muir R, Haswell Wilson G: Observations on influenza and its complications. Br Med J. 1919, 1 (3027): 3-5. 10.1136/bmj.1.3027.3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Morens DM, Taubenberger JK, Fauci AS: Predominant role of bacterial pneumonia as a cause of death in pandemic influenza: implications for pandemic influenza preparedness. J Infect Dis. 2008, 198 (7): 962-70. 10.1086/591708.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Klugman KP, Astley CM, Lipsitch M: Time from onset to death for 1918 influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008, 14 (8): 1193-9. 10.3201/eid1408.071313.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gill JR, Sheng ZM, Ely S, Guinee DG, Beasley MB, Suh J, Deshpande C, Mollura DJ, Morens DM, Bray M, Travis WD, Taubenberger JK: Pulmonary Pathologic Findings of Fatal 2009 Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1 Viral Infections. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010, 134: E1-9.Google Scholar
- Madhi SA, Klugman KP, Vaccine Trialist Group: A role for Streptococcus pneumoniae in virus-associated pneumonia. Nat Med. 2004, 10 (8): 811-13. 10.1038/nm1077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP): Preventing pneumococcal disease among infants and young children: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2000, 49 (RR-9): 1-35.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Recommended Immunization Schedules for Persons Aged 0--18 Years --- United States, 2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008, 57 (01): Q1-Q4.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Active Bacterial Core Surveillance (ABCs) Report: Emerging Infections Program Network. Streptococcus pneumoniae 2006. 2008, Accessed December 24, [http://www.cdc.gov/abcs/survreports/spneu06.pdf]Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Active Bacterial Core Surveillance (ABCs) Report: Emerging Infections Program Network. Streptococcus pneumoniae 1998. 2008, Accessed December 24, [http://www.cdc.gov/abcs/survreports/spneu98.pdf]Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Progress in introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine--worldwide, 2000-2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008, 57 (42): 1148-51.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Direct and indirect effects of routine vaccination of children with 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease--United States, 1998-2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005, 54 (36): 893-97.Google Scholar
- Grijalva CG, Nuorti JP, Arbogast PG, Martin SW, Edwards KM, Griffin MR: Decline in pneumonia admissions after routine childhood immunisation with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the USA: a time-series analysis. Lancet. 2007, 369 (9568): 1179-86. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60564-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitney CG, Farley MM, Hadler J, Harrison LH, Bennett NM, Lynfield R, Reingold A, Cieslak PR, Pilishvili T, Jackson D, Facklam RR, Jorgensen JH, Schuchat A, Active Bacterial Core Surveillance of the Emerging Infections Program Network: Decline in invasive pneumococcal disease after the introduction of protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccine. New Engl J Med. 2003, 348 (18): 1737-46. 10.1056/NEJMoa022823.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, eds: Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. 1996, Oxford University Press; New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Ray GT, Whitney CG, Fireman BH, Ciuryla V, Black SB: Cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine- evidence from the first 5 years of use in the United States incorporating herd effects. Pediatr Infect Dis. 2006, 25 (6): 494-501. 10.1097/01.inf.0000222403.42974.8b.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lieu TA, Ray GT, Black SB, Butler JC, Klein JO, Breiman RF, Miller MA, Shinefield HR: Projected cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination of healthy infants and young children. JAMA. 2000, 283 (11): 1460-68. 10.1001/jama.283.11.1460.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Black S, Shinefield H, Fireman B, Lewis E, Ray P, Hansen JR, Elvin L, Ensor KM, Hackell J, Siber G, Malinoski F, Madore D, Chang I, Kohberger R, Watson W, Austrian R, Edwards K: Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000, 19 (3): 187-95. 10.1097/00006454-200003000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- CDC Wonder: Bridged-Race Population Estimates (Vintage 2006). 2008, Accessed August 7, [http://wonder.cdc.gov/bridged-race-v2006.html]Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Estimated vaccination coverage with individual vaccines and selected vaccination series among children 19-35 months of age by state and local area. 2008, Accessed December 24, [http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/stats-surv/nis/tables/06/tab03_antigen_state.xls]Google Scholar
- Black SB, Shinefield HR, Ling S, Hansen J, Fireman B, Spring D, Noyes J, Lewis E, Ray P, Lee J, Hackell J: Effectiveness of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children less than five years of age for prevention of pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002, 21 (9): 810-15. 10.1097/00006454-200209000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pomeroy SL, Holmes SJ, Dodge PR, Feigin RD: Seizures and other neurologic sequelae of bacterial meningitis in children. N Engl J Med. 1990, 323 (24): 1651-57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McIntyre PB, Berkey CS, King SM, Schaad UB, Kilpi T, Kanra GY, Perez CM: Dexamethasone as adjunctive therapy in bacterial meningitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials since 1988. JAMA. 1997, 278: 925-31. 10.1001/jama.278.11.925.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shepard CW, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Scott RD, Rosenstein NE, ABCs Team: Cost-effectiveness of conjugate meningococcal vaccination strategies in the United States. Pediatrics. 2005, 115 (5): 1220-32. 10.1542/peds.2004-2514.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robinson K, Baughman W, Rothrock G, Barrett NL, Pass M, Lexau C, Damaske B, Stefonek K, Barnes B, Patterson J, Zell ER, Schuchat A, Whitney CG, Active Bacterial Core Surveillance (ABCs)/Emerging Infections Program Network: Epidemiology of invasive streptococcus pneumoniae infections in the United States, 1995-1998: opportunities for prevention in the conjugate vaccine era. JAMA. 2001, 285 (13): 1729-35. 10.1001/jama.285.13.1729.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE, Coley CM, Marrie TJ, Kapoor WN: A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community- acquired pneumonia. New Engl J Med. 1997, 336 (4): 243-50. 10.1056/NEJM199701233360402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou F, Shefer A, Kong Y, Nuorti JP: Trends in acute otitis media-related health care utilization by privately insured young children in the United States, 1997-2004. Pediatrics. 2008, 121 (2): 253-60. 10.1542/peds.2007-0619.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hansen J, Black S, Shinefield H, Cherian T, Benson J, Fireman B, Lewis E, Ray P, Lee J: Effectiveness of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children younger than 5 years of age for prevention of pneumonia: updated analysis using World Health Organization standardized interpretation of chest radiographs. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006, 25 (9): 779-81. 10.1097/01.inf.0000232706.35674.2f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klugman KP, Madhi SA, Huebner RE, Kohberger R, Mbelle N, Pierce N, Vaccine Trialists Group: A trial of a 9-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children with and those without HIV infection. New Engl J Med. 2003, 349 (14): 1341-48. 10.1056/NEJMoa035060.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nelson JC, Jackson M, Yu O, Whitney CG, Bounds L, Bittner R, Zavitkovsky A, Jackson LA: Impact of the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on rates of community acquired pneumonia in children and adults. Vaccine. 2008, 26 (38): 4947-54. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.07.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): 2002-03 U.S. influenza season summary. 2008, Accessed December 24, [http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/weeklyarchives2002-2003/02-03summary.htm]Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): 2003-04 U.S. influenza season summary. 2008, Accessed December 24, [http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/weeklyarchives2003-2004/03-04summary.htm]Google Scholar
- Grabowska K, Högberg L, Penttinen P, Svensson A, Ekdahl K: Occurrence of invasive pneumococcal disease and number of excess cases due to influenza. BMC Infect Dis. 2006, 6: 58-10.1186/1471-2334-6-58.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Stiver G: The treatment of influenza with antiviral drugs. CMAJ. 2003, 168 (1): 49-57.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jefferson T, Demicheli V, Di Pietrantonj C, Rivetti D: Amantadine and rimantadine for influenza A in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006, CD001169-2Google Scholar
- Nichol KL: Cost-benefit analysis of a strategy to vaccinate healthy working adults against influenza. Arch Intern Med. 2001, 161 (5): 749-59. 10.1001/archinte.161.5.749.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nordstrom BL, Sung L, Suter P, Szneke P: Risk of pneumonia and other complications of influenza like illness in patients treated with oseltamivir. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005, 21 (5): 761-68. 10.1185/030079905X46214.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prosser LA, Bridges CB, Uyeki TM, Hinrichsen VL, Meltzer MI, Molinari NA, Schwartz B, Thompson WW, Fukuda K, Lieu TA: Health benefits, risks, and cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination of children. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006, 12 (10): 1548-58.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Aballéa S, Chancellor J, Martin M, Wutzler P, Carrat F, Gasparini R, Toniolo-Neto J, Drummond M, Weinstein M: The cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination for people aged 50-64 years: an international model. Value Health. 2007, 10 (2): 98-116. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00157.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arias E, United States life tables, 2004: National Vital Statistics Reports 2007. 2008, 56 (9): Accessed December 24, [http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr56/nvsr56_09.pdf]
- Monte SV, Paolini NM, Slazak EM, Schentag JJ, Paladino JA: Costs of treating lower respiratory tract infections. Am J Manag Care. 2008, 14 (4): 190-96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grijalva CG, Poehling KA, Nuorti JP, Zhu Y, Martin SW, Edwards KM, Griffin MR: National impact of universal childhood immunization with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on outpatient medical care visits in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006, 118: 865-73. 10.1542/peds.2006-0492.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): CDC Vaccine Price List. 2009, Accessed January 5, [http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/vfc/cdc-vac-price-list.htm]Google Scholar
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: 2008, Accessed December 24, [http://www.bls.gov]
- Melegaro A, Edmunds WJ: Cost-effectiveness analysis of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination in England and Wales. Vaccine. 2004, 22 (31-32): 4203-14. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.05.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Erickson LJ, De Wals P, McMahon J, Heim S: Complications of meningococcal disease in college students. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 33 (5): 737-39. 10.1086/322587.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oostenbrook R, Moll H, Essink-Bot ML: The EQ-5D and the Health Utilities Index for permanent sequelae after meningitis: a head-to-head comparison. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002, 55 (8): 791-99. 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00448-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McCullers JA: Insights into the interaction between influenza virus and pneumococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006, 19 (3): 571-82. 10.1128/CMR.00058-05.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Brundage JF: Interactions between influenza and bacterial respiratory pathogens: implications for pandemic preparedness. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006, 6 (5): 303-12. 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70466-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klugman KP, Madhi SA: Pneumococcal vaccines and flu preparedness. Science. 2007, 316 (5821): 49-50. 10.1126/science.316.5821.49c.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nicholson K, Webster RG, Hay AJ, eds: Textbook of influenza. 1998, Blackwell Science: MaldenGoogle Scholar
- Murray CJ, Lopez AD, Chin B, Feehan D, Hill KH: Estimation of potential global pandemic influenza mortality on the basis of vital registry data from the 1918-20 pandemic: a quantitative analysis. Lancet. 2006, 368 (9554): 2211-18. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69895-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Austrian R, Gold J: Pneumococcal bacteremia with special reference to bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. Ann Intern Med. 1964, 60: 759-76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hanmer J, Lawrence W, Anderson J, Kaplan R, Fryback D: Report of nationally representative values for the noninstitutionalized US adult population for 7 health-related quality-of-life scores. Med Decis Making. 2006, 26 (4): 391-400. 10.1177/0272989X06290497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lloyd A, Patel N, Scott DA, Runge C, Claes C, Rose M: Cost-effectiveness of heptavalent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine (Prevenar) in Germany: considering a high-risk population and herd immunity effects. Eur J Health Econ. 2008, 9 (1): 7-15. 10.1007/s10198-006-0013-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hubben GA, Bos JM, Glynn DM, Ende van der A, van Alphen L, Postma MJ: Enhanced decision support for policy makers using a web interface to health-economic models--illustrated with a cost-effectiveness analysis of nation-wide infant vaccination with the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the Netherlands. Vaccine. 2007, 25 (18): 3669-78. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wisløff T, Abrahamsen TG, Bergsaker MA, Løvoll O, Møller P, Pedersen MK, Kristiansen IS: Cost effectiveness of adding 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate (PCV-7) vaccine to the Norwegian childhood vaccination program. Vaccine. 2006, 24 (29-30): 5690-99. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.04.042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McIntosh ED, Conway P, Willingham J, Lloyd A: The cost-burden of paediatric pneumococcal disease in the UK and the potential cost-effectiveness of prevention using 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Vaccine. 2003, 21 (19-20): 2564-72. 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00031-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Balicer RD, Huerta M, Davidovitch N, Grotto I: Cost-benefit of stockpiling drugs for influenza pandemic. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005, 11 (8): 1280-82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lee VJ, Phua KH, Chenm MI, Chow A, Ma S, Goh KT, Leo YS: Economics of neuraminidase inhibitor stock piling for pandemic influenza, Singapore. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006, 12 (1): 95-102.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Siddiqui MR, Edmunds WJ: Cost-effectiveness of antiviral stockpiling and near-patient testing for potential influenza pandemic. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008, 14 (2): 267-74. 10.3201/eid1402.070478.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- van Genugten MLL, Heijnen MA, Jager JC: Pandemic Influenza and Healthcare Demand in the Netherlands: Scenario Analysis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9 (5): 531-38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Hospitalized Patients with Novel Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Infection - California, April-May 2009. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009, 58 (19): 536-41.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Bacterial Coinfections in Lung Tissue Specimens from Fatal Cases of 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) --- United States, May--August 2009. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009, 58 (38): 1071-74.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Influenza: self-reported vaccination coverage trends 1989 - 2007. 2008, Accessed December 24, [http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/vaccination/pdf/NHIS89_07fluvaxtrendtab.pdf]Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Flu vaccine effectiveness: questions and answers for health professionals. 2008, Accessed December 24, [http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/vaccination/effectivenessqa.htm]Google Scholar
- Peltola VT, McCullers JA: Respiratory viruses predisposing to bacterial infections: role of neuraminidase. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004, 23 (1 Suppl): S87-S97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCullers JA, Rehg JE: Lethal synergism between influenza virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae: characterization of a mouse model and the role of platelet activating factor receptor. J Infect Dis. 2002, 186 (3): 341-50. 10.1086/341462.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun K, Metzger DW: Inhibition of pulmonary antibacterial defense by interferon-gamma during recovery from influenza infection. Nat Med. 2008, 14 (5): 558-64. 10.1038/nm1765.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/10/14/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.