Skip to main content
Download PDF

Phenotypic characteristics of isolates of Aspergillus section Fumigatifrom different geographic origins and their relationships with genotypic characteristics

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 11, Article number: 116 (2011) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Epidemiological studies worldwide have shown that A. fumigatus exhibits important phenotypic and genotypic diversity, and these findings have been of great importance in improving the diagnosis and treatment of diseases caused by this fungus. However, few studies have been carried out related to the epidemiology of this fungus in Latin America. This study´s aim is to report on the epidemiology of the fungus by analyzing the phenotypic variability of Aspergillus section Fumigati isolates from different Latin American countries and the relationship between this variability, the geographical origin and genotypic characteristics.

Methods

We analyzed the phenotypic characteristics (macro- and micromorphology, conidial size, vesicles size, antifungal susceptibility and thermotolerance at 28, 37 and 48°C) of A. section Fumigati isolates from Mexico (MX), Argentina (AR), Peru (PE) and France (FR). The results were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's multiple comparison test to detect significant differences. Two dendrograms among isolates were obtained with UPGMA using the Euclidean distance index. One was drawn for phenotypic data, and the other for phenotypic and genotypic data. A PCoA was done for shown isolates in a space of reduced dimensionality. In order to determine the degree of association between the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics AFLP, we calculated the correlation between parwise Euclidean distance matrices of both data sets with the nonparametric Mantel test.

Results

No variability was found in the macromorphology of the studied isolates; however, the micromorphology and growth rate showed that the PE isolates grew at a faster rate and exhibited the widest vesicles in comparison to the isolates from MX, AR and FR. The dendrogram constructed with phenotypic data showed three distinct groups. The group I and II were formed with isolates from PE and FR, respectively, while group III was formed with isolates from MX and AR. The dendrogram with phenotypic and genotypic data showed the same cluster, except for an isolate from FR that formed a separate cluster. This cluster was confirmed using PCoA. The correlation between the phenotypic and genotypic data of the isolates revealed a statistically significant association between these characteristics.

Conclusions

The PE isolates showed specific phenotypic characteristics that clearly differentiate them from the rest of the isolates, which matches the genotypic data. The correlation between the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics showed a statistically significant association. In conclusion, phenotypic and genotypic methods together increase the power of correlation between isolates.

Peer Review reports

Background

Aspergillus fumigatus Fresenius is a filamentous, saprophytic fungus of great biological importance, as it is one of the major opportunistic pathogens causing invasive aspergillosis (IA) in immunosuppressed patients [1, 2]. Its association with this type of patients depends on the host characteristics and on some typical phenotypic features that contribute to its pathogenicity such as its nutritional versatility, growth rate and efficient sporulation at a temperature of 37°C or higher [3, 4].

Aspergillus section Fumigati has recently been reclassified by Samson et al. [5]. It currently contains 25 different species, with 8 anamorphs and 17 telemorphs. In the section Fumigati, besides A. fumigatus, other species, such as Neorsartorya fischeri, N. pseudofischeri, N. hiratsukae, and A. lentulus, have been reported to be human pathogens [6–8].

There are few studies available on the phenotypic characterization of A. fumigatus. The most relevant have reported variability in the pigment and texture of the colonies, growth rate at different temperatures, size and shape of the conidia, atypical phialides and differences in the size and shape of the conidial heads [9–13].

Other studies have explored the utility of phenotypic attributes (serological, immunochemical analysis of isozymes and protein profile) and genotypic characteristics (RFLP [Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism], RAPD [Random Amplification Polymorphic DNA]-PCR and partial sequences of DNA) of A. fumigatus isolates for classification [10, 11, 14–19]. Some studies have also tried to find correlations between the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics, but these studies have so far shown no strict correlation between the compared attributes [11, 12]. However, it is very important to consider certain phenotypic characteristics, as they are useful from an epidemiological point of view and can exhibit differences both within the same species and between different species. In patients with different clinical forms of aspergillosis, the A. fumigatus species has shown differences in its phenotypic characteristics. Depending on the clinical form and the duration of the illness, these morphological changes appear to be the result of selective pressure that is exerted by the microenvironment to which each organism is exposed to [10]. Differences in the phenotypic characteristics have also helped to identify new species, as in the case of A. lentulus, which showed differences in the rate of sporulation and conidial head size and low antifungal susceptibility [7]. Furthermore, Mesa-Arango et al. [20] observed morphological differences in isolates of Sporothrix schenckii that correlated with the geographic region and a special clinical form. Given these findings, in this study the phenotypic variation was analyzed in isolates of A. section Fumigati from Mexico (MX), Argentina (AR), Peru (PE) and France (FR) to find associations between the phenotypic characteristics (the micro- and macromorphology, size of conidia, size vesicles, thermotolerance and susceptibility to antifungal) and the geographic origin of these isolates, as well as to determine the correlation between these traits and previously reported genotypes that were generated by AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism) [21].

Methods

Fungal isolates

Fifty-five isolates of A. section Fumigati were used from different sources and geographical origins. The A. section Fumigati isolates studied were from patients with IA and aspergilloma from AR (n = 24), MX (n = 13), FR (n = 9), and PE (n = 4); environmental isolates were from AR (n = 3) and MX (n = 2). Data for each isolate are shown in Table 1. The fungal isolates were grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) (Bioxon®, Mexico City, MX) at 37°C. The fungal isolates were identified according to the following criteria: development of the conventional colonial morphology, the presence of typical microscopic conidia, and their ability to grow at 48°C.

Table 1 A. section Fumigati isolates studied and their phenotypic characteristics
Full size table

Monospore cultures

From each isolate grown on PDA (Bioxon®) for 2-4 d at 37°C, a conidial suspension was prepared with 1 mL of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST). This suspension was diluted (1:1000) and 50 μL was used for growth on PDA medium (Bioxon®). The Petri dishes were incubated at 37°C and observed for colonial growth. Only one colony was selected from each plate, and grown in PDA (Bioxon®) agar slants at 37°C. The conidia of the monospores were conserved in sterile water at 4°C.

Macromorphology

The isolates of A. section Fumigati grown on PDA (Bioxon®) at 37°C for 4 d were observed to identify the morphological characteristics of each culture (the color and texture of the colony).

Micromorphology

The micromorphological characteristics of the isolates of A. section Fumigati were analyzed using the microculture method of Ridell [22]. The microculture was incubated at 37°C for 4 d or until the fungus was observed to grow. Subsequently, the cover slip was carefully separated from the agar, placed on a slide with a drop of cotton blue stain and observed under the microscope. We analyzed the morphological characteristics of the conidia and the size of the vesicles. The width of 10 vesicles was measured with a calibrated ocular micrometer (Olympus America Inc., Melvilla, NY, USA).

Thermotolerance

Thermotolerance was measured as described by Mesa-Arango et al. [20]. A suspension of 5 × 103 conidia/mL was prepared with PBST using a Neubauer chamber and inoculated it in triplicate for each temperature (28, 37 and 48°C) considering the growth of each isolate on PDA (Bioxon®) for 4 d at 37°C. We later determined the growth rate of the isolates at each temperature using the following formula: [(colony diameter - inoculum diameter)/days of incubation]. We also calculated the percentage of growth inhibition (%GI) at 28 and 48°C using the following formula: [(colony diameter at 37°C - colony diameter at 28 or 48°C)/colony diameter at 37°C] X 100. To identify heat-sensitive or heat-resistant isolates of A. section Fumigati, we obtained the average %GI at 28 and 48°C by considering all 55 isolates. All isolates that showed a %GI higher than average were considered heat-sensitive, while those with a smaller value of %GI, less than the average, were classified as heat-resistant.

Conidia size

The diameter of 30 conidia for each A. section Fumigati isolate grown on PDA (Bioxon®) and incubated at 37°C for 4 d, was measured with a calibrated ocular micrometer (Olympus America Inc.).

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Samples obtained from microcultures of fungal isolates selected from each country were processed using a modification of the standard procedures for SEM examination [23, 24]. Specimens were fixed on a mixture of 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.5% glutaraldehyde in sodium cacodylate buffer (0.2 M, pH 7.2) for 5 h at 4°C. After three washes of 10 min each with the same cacodylate buffer, the microcultures were postfixed with osmium tetroxide at 1% for 2 h. We proceeded to manually cut the excess agar from both the base and the ends of the samples. The specimens were washed as mentioned and were then dehydrated with increasingly graded ethanol, from 30% to absolute ethanol, at room temperature. Soon after, the samples were dried by the critical point method in a Samdri 780A desiccator (Rockville, MD, USA) using CO2. The samples were mounted on aluminium cylinders with silver paste and placed in a high vacuum evaporator for gold coating for 6 min in a metal ionizing JEOL JFC-1100 (Fine Coat® ion Sputter, JEOL Ltd, Tokyo, JP). The samples were analyzed with a Zeiss DSM-950 scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, DE) at 25 kV and a 10 mm working distance.

Antifungal susceptibility

The monospore cultures were tested for antifungal susceptibility according to the guidelines in the M38-A2 document of the CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) [25]. For this test, we used amphotericin B (AMB) (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis Mo, USA), itraconazole (ITZ) (Janssen Pharmaceutical S.A., Buenos Aires, AR) and voriconazole (VCZ) (Pfizer S.A., Buenos Aires, AR) as standard powders of known potency. The stock solutions of each antifungal agent were prepared with dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma) and diluted with RPMI 1640. Concentration used ranged from 0.0313 to 16 mg /L for the three antifungals. The drug dilutions were placed on 96-well microdilution plates (Nunclon 167008, Nunc, Naperville, IL, USA). The microplates were incubated without agitation at 35°C for 46-50 h. Although there are no defined cutoff values for these antifungal agents, we considered a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value ≥ 4 mg/L as indicating resistance to the drug.

Data analysis

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α = 0.01 and 0.05) and Tukey's multiple comparison test were used to detect significant differences in the conidia size and growth rate at different temperatures. The analyses were performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 12.0 [26].

The thermotolerance results were tested at three temperatures: 28, 37 and 48°C and based on the rate of growth of the colonies (1-7 cm diameter), six categories for each temperature were defined as follows: I (1.0-2.0 cm), II (2.1-3.0 cm), III (3.1-4.0 cm), IV (4.1-5.0 cm) V (5.1-6.0 cm) and VI (6.1-7.0 cm). These categories were coded as multistate character without logical sequence, and together with characters of the conidia and vesicles size were integrated in a single matrix. Pairwise distances among isolates were estimated with Euclidean distance index [27] and a dendrogram was constructed by the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Averages (UPGMA). However, to obtain a best relationship among isolates, we also integrated in a single matrix the phenotypic data obtained in this study and genotypic data (AFLP) reported by Duarte-Escalante et al. [21] of the same isolates (data not shown). A dendrogram of this data set was constructed by UPGMA. The reliability of both dendrograms was evaluated by means of the cophenetic correlation coefficient using the Mantel test [28] after 10,000 permutations and bootstrap. In addition, we carried out a Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) with pairwise Euclidean distances of isolates derived of phenotypic-genotypic data matrix. This method facilitates the detection of associations more complex among isolates in a multidimensional scenario. Finally, a correlation between pairwise Euclidean distance matrices of phenotypic and genotypic characteristics was estimated with Mantel´s non-parametric test [28] after 10,000 permutations. All these analyses were carried out with NTSYS-PC v 2.0 [29].

Results

Macromorphology

All isolates had the typical macromorphology of the species. The color of the front was teal with a white border, and the back was cream-colored. The texture of the colonies was velvety or powdery.

Micromorphology

Micromorphology showed different sizes (widths) of vesicles. The PE isolates showed the widest vesicles (23.35 ± 0.75 μm), followed by FR (20.73 ± 0.83 μm), MX (17.97 ± 0.84 μm) and AR (17.62 ± 0.78 μm). However, these sizes are within the range that is described for A. fumigatus.

Thermotolerance

All of the isolates grew at the three tested temperatures, with 37°C being the optimal temperature for growth (Table 1). However, statistically significant differences were found (P < 0.05) in the growth rates of the isolates at the three temperatures used. The isolates from PE grew faster than did those from FR, MX and AR (Table 2).

Table 2 Data analysis of the phenotypic characteristics of isolates of A. section Fumigati
Full size table

According to the values obtained for %GI (Table 1), there were differences in thermotolerance. At 28°C, the thermosensitive isolates were those with a %GI ≥ 36, where the heat-resistant isolates had a value of < 36. At 48°C, the thermosensitive isolates were defined as having a %GI ≥ 14, and the heat-resistant isolates had values of < 14. At 28°C, 100% of the isolates from PE were heat-resistant, while only 52%, 33% and 7% of the isolates from AR, FR and MX, respectively, were heat-resistant. At 48°C, all of the isolates from PE were also heat-resistant, and 70, 60 and 67% of the isolates from AR, MX and FR, respectively, were also heat-resistant at this temperature (Table 1).

Conidia size

The diameters of the conidia of all isolates ranged from 2.56 to 2.89 μm. The conidia of the isolates from AR were the largest (2.72 ± 0.62), followed by those from PE (2.62 ± 0.40), MX (2.61 ± 0.35) and FR (2.58 ± 0.22). The average diameter of the conidia for the isolates from AR and FR were significantly different (P < 0.05) (Table 2).

Scanning electron microscopy

SEM analysis confirmed the statistically significant differences that were observed in the photon microscopy analysis on the size of the conidia and the vesicles of the A. section Fumigati isolates selected from each country (Figure 1). The conidia of the isolates from AR were the largest, followed by those from PE, MX and FR. In reference to the size of the vesicles of the isolates selected from each country, we observed that the PE isolates had widest vesicles, followed by FR, MX and AR. Similarly, there was greater sporulation in PE isolates proven by the presence of conidial heads while isolates from MX, AR and FR had less conidial heads (Figure 1c).

Figure 1
figure 1

Scanning Electron Microscopy of the phenotypic characteristics of A . section Fumigati isolates selected from each country. Conidia size (a); vesicles size (b) and growth rate (c). The samples were processed with a conventional technique for SEM. Abbreviations: AR-Argentina; MX-Mexico; FR- France and PE-Peru.

Full size image

Antifungal Susceptibility

With regard to antifungal susceptibility drugs, the range of the MICs for VCZ for all isolates was 0.06 to 0.5 mg/L, for ITZ 0.03 to ≥ 16 mg/L and for AMB 0.25 to 2.0 mg/L. The antifungal susceptibility results varied (Table 1), and there were no isolates that were resistant to AMB and VCZ only to ITZ. The AR isolates (9272, 8571, 6578) were resistant to ITZ. Isolates from MX, FR and PE showed no resistance to antifungal drugs (Table 1).

Data Analysis

The dendrogram obtained with phenotypic data of the A. section Fumigati isolates, yielded three clusters (Figure 2). The first cluster (group I) included all the isolates from PE with a high association between them and a bootstrap of 74%. The second cluster (group II) consisted of isolates from FR, whose bootstrap was of 67%. Group III consisted of isolates from MX and AR with major distances and a bootstrap of 58%.

Figure 2
figure 2

Dendrogram based on phenotypic data (conidia and vesicle size and thermotolerance), generated by UPGMA using Euclidean distances ( r = 0.89859, P = 0.0004) of A . section Fumigati isolates from MX, AR, FR and PE. The number on the nodes represents the support values based on 10,000 bootstrap replicas.

Full size image

The dendrogram generated with the similarity matrices of pheno and genotypic data of the A. section Fumigati isolates yielded three clusters (Figure 3). The first cluster (group I) consisted only one isolate from FR relatedness with the group II. The second cluster (group II) showed two subgroups. Subgroup IIa included all isolates from PE, and subgroup IIb included isolates from FR. Finally, the third cluster (group III) also contained two subgroups well differenced. Subgroup IIIa consisted of isolates from MX and AR. Subgroup IIIb consisted of isolates from MX and AR. Bootstrap values for into this groups were low but among them were above from 50%.

Figure 3
figure 3

Dendrogram based on phenotypic (conidia and vesicle size and thermotolerance) and genotypic data (AFLP), generated by UPGMA using Euclidean distances ( r = 0.78763, P = 0.0004) of 55 A . section Fumigati isolates from MX, AR, FR and PE. The number on the nodes represents the support values based on 10,000 bootstrap replicas.

Full size image

These results are reinforced by the PCoA (Figure 4) that shows three groups that depended almost on the geographical origins of the isolates (MX, AR, FR and PE). The first three principal coordenates of the analysis explained 51.65% of the observed variation, specifically the first component explained 28.66% of variation, the second component 15.50%, and the third component 6.49%. These findings largely correspond to the clustering obtained by UPGMA (Figure 3).

Figure 4
figure 4

Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of pheno and genotypic data of 55 A . section Fumigati isolates from MX, AR, FR y PE in a multidimensional space.

Full size image

When we correlated the pairwise Euclidean distance matrices of the phenotypic characteristics (size of the conidia, size of the vesicles and thermotolerance) with the genotypic characteristics (AFLP) of the studied A. section Fumigati isolates, a statistically significant relationship (r = 0.105, p = 0.038) was found, showing there is an association between the two types of characteristics.

Discussion

The A. fumigatus fungus is widely distributed around the world. In Latin American countries, not much research has been done to establish their phenotypic and genotypic variability. To provide more information regarding this fungus, we studied the phenotypic characteristics (the micro- and macromorphology, size of the conidia, vesicles size, thermotolerance and antifungal susceptibility) of clinical and environmental isolates of A. fumigatus from MX, AR, PE and FR, and we assessed the relationship between the phenotypic and the genotypic characteristics reported in the literature for these isolates [21], to determine whether the variability of the phenotypic characteristics correlated with the genotypic characteristics. The phenotypic characterization was not different from that reported for the specie; however, some interesting observations are worth highlighting concerning the size of the vesicles, thermotolerance and growth rate at different temperatures (28, 37 and 48°C). The PE and AR isolates were characterized by exhibiting larger conidia (Figure 1), although the size range found matches that reported by Rinyu et al. [11], who determined that the size of the conidia of clinical and environmental A. fumigatus isolates from different countries was 2.5-3.5 μm. The sizes of the vesicles varied according to their geographic origin, and the PE isolates had the widest vesicles (Figure 1). Another interesting phenotypic characteristic was the thermotolerance at 28, 37 and 48°C, where all isolates grew at the three temperatures; however, the PE isolates had the highest growth rate at 48°C (Table 2). The thermotolerance and growth rate have been determined to be virulence factors [3, 4, 30], and it is therefore possible that the isolates from PE, due to their phenotypic characteristics, are more virulent than are those from AR, MX and FR. In other fungi, it has also been observed that the virulent strains have specific phenotypic characteristics that differentiate them from those that are less virulent. In H. capsulatum, the dimorphic transition rate at 37°C was found to be a key factor in the pathogenicity of three strains with different degrees of virulence that were studied, as that with the highest virulence was transformed to the yeast phase (virulent) more quickly [31]. Phenotypic differences associated with geographical areas have also been observed in other human pathogens, such as S. schenckii isolates from MX, Colombia (CO) and Guatemala (GT). The isolates from CO were heat-resistant and had larger conidia than those from MX and GT. Furthermore, genotyping by RAPD-PCR showed that these isolates were grouped according to their geographical origin [20]. The authors also suggested that the characteristics of the isolates from CO were related to the clinical form of the disease, as the fixed form of sporotrichosis predominates in CO.

Because the isolates from PE showed characteristics that were different from the other isolates studied, we measured their antifungal susceptibility agents AMB, ITZ and VCZ. Some new species of A. section Fumigati, for example A. lentulus, show an association between resistance to antifungal and slow sporulation [32]. However, this study found no such association in the group from PE, with only the AR fungus showing resistant isolates. In this study, resistance to antifungal showed no association to their geographical origin.

However, the dendrogram built based on the phenotypic characteristics (thermotolerance, conidia and vesicle sizes) (Figure 2) show that the isolates from FR and PE cluster according to their geographical origin, while isolates from MX and AR form a single cluster unrelated to their geographical origin. This is contrary to what is observed when analyzing the genotypical characteristics, where the majority of the isolates separate according to geographic origin [21]. This confirms that these molecular markers are more sensible to the discrimination between isolates by geographic origin. On the other hand, when the dendrogram was built including the phenotypes and genotypes (Figure 3), it was seen that the isolation of the Af-34 from FR formed an independent group not shown in the dendrogram built only with the phenotypic data, nor recorded in Duarte-Escalante et al. [21]. This cluster is confirmed using PCoA. It is interesting to note that the discrimination power increases when the phenotypic and genotypic methods are analyzed together.

It is noteworthy that although the phenotypic characteristics do not differentiate phylogenetic species of A. section Fumigati, they do help show the intraspecies differences [33], since the species included in this section have morphological differences which may lead to an erroneous identification and reason why these organisms are discarded since they are considered as contaminants. To avoid this error, it is important to take the morphological differences into consideration to later confirm the presence of another species using genotypical methods, such as the analysis of partial sequences of the ß-tubulin-encoding gene (benA), the mitochondrial cytochrome b-encoding gene (mtcytb), the rodlet A encoding gene (rodA), the salt-responsive gene, the internal transcribed spacer (ITS)1-5.8S-ITS2 region, the genes encoding calmodulin and actin [5, 7, 17, 33–35]. Additionally, it is important to note that a good differentiation, whether intra or interspecies, is based on the results of the combination of phenotypic and genotypic methods since the phenotypic characteristics by themselves do not differentiate them but provide a hint towards the identification of a species later confirmed using molecular methods.

On the other hand, when distance matrices are generated from phenotypic and genotypic (AFLP) characteristics, we found a low correlation (r = 0.0105), probably due to the number of PE isolates studied. However, the association between them was statistically significant (p = 0.032). This association again supports that certain phenotypical characteristics (growth rate and vesicle size) work together to cluster the isolates according to geographical origin. However, it is noteworthy that the phenotypic characteristics may vary depending on the surrounding environmental conditions where the fungus grows since the expression of a phenotypic character is the result of the interaction of the genotype with the environment and is therefore likely to be modified when environmental conditions such as climate, age of culture or incubation temperature vary. In addition, it may be the case that the genetic information is not completely expressed and the phenotype reflects only a small part of this information [36].

Conclusions

The correlation between the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics showed a statistically significant association. We consider that the phenotypic and genotypic methods together increase the power discrimination between isolates. Moreover, it is pertinent to point out that in order to obtain greater knowledge about the phenotypic variability of A. fumigatus, it is important to gather a greater number of isolates from PE and FR. It also highlights the need for each country to carry out specific studies for determining the molecular or phenotypic tools that are appropriate for the correct identification of the fungus and for providing proper treatment. These studies will also identify sources of infection, resulting in a better control of aspergillosis.

References

  1. Latgé JP: Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999, 12: 310-350.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Latgé JP: Aspergillus fumigatus, a saprotrotophic pathogenic fungus. Mycologist. 2003, 17: 56-61. 10.1017/S0269915X0300209X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Araujo R, Rodrigues AG: Variability of germinative potencial among pathogenic species of Aspergillus. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 4335-4337. 10.1128/JCM.42.9.4335-4337.2004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rhodes JC: Aspergillus fumigatus: Growth and virulence. Med Mycol. 2006, 44: S77-S81. 10.1080/13693780600779419.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Samson RA, Hong S, Peterson SW, Frisvad JC, Varga J: Polyphasic taxonomy of Aspergillus section Fumigati and its teleomorph Neosartorya. Stud Mycol. 2007, 59: 147-203. 10.3114/sim.2007.59.14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Balajee SA, Gribskov J, Brandt M, Ito J, Fothergill A, Marr KA: Mistaken identity: Neosartorya pseudofischeri and its anamorph masquerading as Aspergillus fumigatus. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 5996-5999. 10.1128/JCM.43.12.5996-5999.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Balajee SA, Gribskov JL, Hanley E, Nickle D, Marr KA: Aspergillus lentulus sp. nov., a new sibling species of A. fumigatus. Eukaryot Cell. 2005, 4: 625-632. 10.1128/EC.4.3.625-632.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Guarro J, Kallas EG, Godoy P, Karenina A, Gene J, Stchigel A, Colombo AL: Cerebral aspergillosis caused by Neosartorya hiratsukae, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002, 8: 989-991.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Marsella R, Mercantini R, Stefanini A, Volterra L: An atypical isolate of Aspergillus fumigatus from a man affected with a pulmonary disease. Mykosen. 1983, 26: 201-206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leslie CE, Flannigan B, Milne LJ: Morphological studies on clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus. J Med Vet Mycol. 1988, 26: 335-341. 10.1080/02681218880000481.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rinyu E, Varga J, Ferenczy L: Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of variability in Aspergillus fumigatus. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 35: 2567-2575.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt A, Wolff MH: Morphological characteristics of Aspergillus fumigatus strains isolated from patient samples. Mycoses. 1997, 40: 347-351. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1997.tb00248.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chanteperdrix V, Bourgerette E, Gantier JC, de Faverges G, Herman D, Lauby M: Mycological examination of a non-uniseriate Fumigati section's Aspergillus. Ann Biol Clin. 2008, 66: 581-583. Paris

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Burnie JP, Coke A, Matthews RC: Restriction endonuclease analysis of Aspergillus fumigatus DNA. J Clin Pathol. 1992, 45: 324-327. 10.1136/jcp.45.4.324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsuda H, Kohno S, Maesaki S, Yamada H, Koga H, Tamura M, Kuraishi H, Sugiyama J: Application of ubiquinone systems and electrophoretic comparison of enzymes to identification of clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus and several other species of Aspergillus. J Clin Microbiol. 1992, 30: 1999-2005.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Debeapuis JP, Sarfati J, Chazalet V, Latgé JP: Genetic diversity among clinical and environmental isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus. Infect Immun. 1997, 65: 3080-3085.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang L, Yokoyama K, Miyaji M, Nishimura K: Mitochondrial cytochrome b gene analysis Aspergillus fumigatus and related species. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 1352-1358.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rath PM: Phenotipic and genotypic characterization of reference strains of the genus Aspergillus. Mycoses. 2001, 44: 65-72. 10.1046/j.1439-0507.2001.00620.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Katz ME, Dougall AM, Weeks K, Cheetham BF: Multiple genetically distinct groups revealed among clinical isolates identified as atypical Aspergillus fumigatus. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 551-555. 10.1128/JCM.43.2.551-555.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mesa-Arango AC, Reyes-Montes MR, Pérez-Mejía A, Navarro-Barranco H, Souza V, Zúñiga G, Toriello C: Phenotyping and genotyping of Sporothrix schenckii isolates according to geographic origin and clinical form of sporotrichosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 3004-3011. 10.1128/JCM.40.8.3004-3011.2002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Duarte-Escalante E, Zúñiga G, Nava-Ramírez O, Córdoba S, Refojo N, Arenas R, Delhaes L, Reyes-Montes MR: Population structure and diversity of the pathogenic fungus Aspergillus fumigatus isolated from different sources and geographic origins. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009, 104: 427-433. 10.1590/S0074-02762009000300005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ridell R: Permanent stained micological preparations obtained by slide culture. Mycology. 1950, 42: 265-270. 10.2307/3755439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nowell JA, Parules JB: Preparation of experimental tissue for scanning electron microscopy. 1980, AMSO-HARE

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bacilio-Jimenez M, Aguilar-Flores S, del Valle MV, Perez A, Zepeda A, Zenteno E: Endophytic bacteria in rice seeds inhibit early colonization of roots by Azospirillum brasilense. Soil Biol Biochem. 2001, 33: 167-172. 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00126-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. CLSI: Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard-second edition. CLSI document M38-A2. 2008, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (formely NCCLS), 940 West Valley Road, Wayne, Pa

    Google Scholar 

  26. Montgomery DC: Diseño y Análisis de Experimentos. 1991, Grupo Editorial Iberoamericana

    Google Scholar 

  27. Legendre P, Legendre L: Numerical Ecology. 1998, Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  28. Manly JF: Randomization bootstrap and montecarlo. Methods in Biology. 1997, Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rohlf FJ: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. 1998, Exeter Software Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bhabhra R, Askew DS: Thermotolerance and virulence of Aspergillus fumigatus: role of the fungal nucleolus. Med Mycol. 2005, 43: S87-S93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Keath EJ, Painter AA, Kobayashi G, Medoff G: Variable expression of a yeast-phase-specific gene in Histoplasma capsulatum strains differing in thermotolerance and virulence. Infect Immun. 1989, 57: 1384-1390.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Balajee SA, Weaver M, Imhof A, Gribskov J, Marr KA: Aspergillus fumigatus variant with decreased susceptibility to multiple antifungals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004, 48: 1197-1203. 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1197-1203.2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yaguchi T, Horie Y, Tanaka R, Matsuzawa T, Ito J, Nishimura K: Molecular phylogenetics of multiple genes on Aspergillus section Fumigati isolated from clinical specimens in Japan. Nippon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi. 2007, 48: 37-46. 10.3314/jjmm.48.37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Balajee SA, Nickle D, Varga J, Marr KA: Molecular studies reveal frequent misidentification of Aspergillus fumigatus by morphotyping. Eukaryot Cell. 2006, 5: 1705-1712. 10.1128/EC.00162-06.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Hong SB, Go SJ, Shin HD, Frisvad JC, Samson RA: Polyphasic taxonomy of Aspergillus fumigatus and related species. Mycologia. 2005, 97: 1316-1329. 10.3852/mycologia.97.6.1316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bertout S, Renaud F, Barton R, Symoens F, Burnod J, Piens MA, Lebeau B, Viviani MA, Chapuis F, Bastide JM, Grillot R, Mallié , The Europan Research Group on Biotype and Genotype of Aspergillus: Genetic Polymorphism of Aspergillus fumigatus in clinical samples from patients with invasive aspergillosis: Investigation using multiple typing methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 1731-1737. 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1731-1737.2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data presented here are part of the doctoral thesis of MGFDL (Programa de Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM) who has a fellowship from CONACyT (Grant 172552).

This research was supported by Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología del Distrito Federal (ICyTDF). PIFUTP08-122 and Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA) DGAPA-UNAM-IN224706-3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratorio de Micología Molecular Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad Universitaria No. 3000, México D.F, 04360, Mexico

    María Guadalupe Frías-De León, Monserrat Zavala-Ramírez, Esperanza Duarte-Escalante & María del Rocío Reyes-Montes

  2. Departamento de Micologia, INEI ANLIS "Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán", Av. Velez Sarsfield 563, 1281, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Susana Córdoba

  3. Departamento de Zoología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México D.F, 11340, Mexico

    Gerardo Zúñiga

  4. Departamento de Biología Celular y Tisular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad Universitaria No. 3000, México D.F, 04360, Mexico

    Armando Pérez-Torres, Armando Zepeda-Rodríguez & Irma López-Martínez

  5. Servicio de Micología, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

    María José Buitrago

Authors
  1. María Guadalupe Frías-De León
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Monserrat Zavala-Ramírez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susana Córdoba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gerardo Zúñiga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Esperanza Duarte-Escalante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Armando Pérez-Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Armando Zepeda-Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Irma López-Martínez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. María José Buitrago
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. María del Rocío Reyes-Montes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María del Rocío Reyes-Montes.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MGFDL and MZR conducted the experiments. SC contributed isolates from Argentina and carried out the test of antifungal susceptibility agents. EDE and GZ participated in the statistical analysis of the study. APT, AZR and ILM performed the scanning electron microscopy analysis. MJB provided a critical review of the manuscript. MRRM designed the study and supervised the laboratory procedures and the data analysis. MGFDL and MRRM analyzed and interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript and approved its final version.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frías-De León, M.G., Zavala-Ramírez, M., Córdoba, S. et al. Phenotypic characteristics of isolates of Aspergillus section Fumigatifrom different geographic origins and their relationships with genotypic characteristics. BMC Infect Dis 11, 116 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-116

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-116

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us